Certain Mental Health/Substance Abuse Plan Provisions Raise Red FlagsThe Department of Labor has provided sample mental health/substance abuse (MH/SA) plan provisions that require scrutiny to determine compliance with the federal Mental Health Parity rules (MHPAEA). Here are some common red flags: Pre-Authorization or Pre-Service Notification requirements - Blanket requirements for all MH/SA services - Review required following a certain number of days of in-patient treatment - Medical necessity and prescription drug reviews that differ from those imposed on medical services (such as deferring to attending physicians for medical reviews but not MH/SA or requiring authorization every 90 days for prescriptions relating to MH benefits but not medical) - Pre-notification requirements for extended out-patient visits Fail-First Protocols - Lack of progress with less intensive treatment required prior to intensive out-patient treatment - In-patient SA rehabilitation is not authorized unless patient first fails with out-patient treatment - In-patient MH treatment is not authorized unless patient first completes a partial hospitalization treatment option Probability of Improvement - Residential treatment is covered only if there is a likelihood it will result in measurable improvement Written Treatment Plan Required - Plan requires a written treatment plan for MH/SA benefits Other - Benefits excluded if patient fails to comply with treatment plan requirements - Exclusion of residential level of treatment - Geographical limitations that differ from those imposed on medical benefits - Licensure requirements imposed for MH/SA facilities but not for medical facilities Plans with these types of provisions should carefully compare them to the rules imposed for medical/surgical benefits to ensure compliance with the MHPAEA. For more information, please click here to view the fact sheet released by the Department of Labor.
×
|
